vs
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
QUOTE
Silicon Knights sues Epic Games
Too Human developer takes Unreal Engine creators to court, saying they broke contracts with licensing partners in order to give Gears of War a head start on the competition.
By Brendan Sinclair, GameSpot
Posted Jul 19, 2007 5:56 pm PT
Last August, rumors spread that Silicon Knights was ditching Unreal Engine 3 for its long-awaited Xbox 360 game Too Human, because the frequently licensed game engine supposedly ran poorly on Microsoft's console. Those rumors didn't last too long before Silicon Knights president Denis Dyack squashed them in a statement, saying rumors of the group "completely scrapping" the engine were false.
Despite Dyack's statement, those rumors appear to have been partially true, as revealed by Silicon Knights this week in a 54-page lawsuit it filed against Epic Games over Unreal Engine 3. In its complaint, the Ontario-based developer claims that it licensed the engine based on "false and misleading statements" from Epic. Silicon Knights said the Gears of War creator's contractual breaches forced it to begin making its own game engine last May, just before an underwhelming public debut of the Unreal-powered Too Human at the Electronic Entertainment Expo.
According to the suit, Epic "has caused Silicon Knights to experience considerable losses and ultimately has forced Silicon Knights to spend its limited time and resources on building its own game engine rather than in developing its video game." It goes on to say that instead of supporting its licensing partners, Epic has used its fees to develop its own competing products "while simultaneously sabotaging efforts by Silicon Knights and others to develop their own video games."
Epic Games fired off an e-mail to various press outlets this afternoon to address the suit. "This morning we were served with a lawsuit by Silicon Knights," wrote Epic Games president Mark Rein. "We believe the claims against us are unfounded and without merit and we intend to fully defend against them. We'd love to tell you more about it but unfortunately our lawyers want us to save our comments for the courthouse so we're going to do our best to comply with their wishes. In that vein we'd appreciate if our friends in the industry and media would refrain from asking us about the suit because we're only going to say 'no comment.' We just wanted to share the news directly before the rumor mill starts churning."
The suit describes part of the licensing agreement, which called on Silicon Knights to use Unreal Engine 3 exclusively in its Xbox 360, PC, and PlayStation 3 games and advertise them as being powered by the technology. For Epic's part, it had to provide a working engine for the Xbox 360 and PS3 within six months of each system's final development kits being sent out, as well as continued support and updates. For the Xbox 360, that would have meant March of 2006. (The suit notes that Silicon Knights has contracted with Sega to make a PS3 game; originally the title was announced for an unnamed console.)
"That delivery date is significant, since compliance by Epic would have given Silicon Knights time to prepare an appropriate demonstration version of its Microsoft Xbox 360 game, Too Human, for the very important industry trade show, E3, two month[s] later in May, 2006," the suit reads. "Had Epic complied with its promises and contractual obligations, Silicon Knights would have had the opportunity not only to generate a positive press and industry response to Too Human, but also to finish the game earlier and on better financial terms."
Silicon Knights claims it received a working Xbox 360 build of the engine a year after Microsoft's system commercially released. Even then, the developer claims it was not told how to implement the code into its development efforts, and that if they rigged the engine themselves in order to make it work, Epic would not support the altered product. As for the PlayStation 3 version of the engine, Silicon Knights said it is still waiting to receive it, even though the agreement called for it to be delivered in February.
The studio also attributes the delay of Too Human from its 2006 release date to Epic, saying it "faced pressure from its publishing partners to nonetheless move forward with development of its games, and with respect to one of those partners (Microsoft), to complete its game as early as possible in 2007." That alone has cost the company millions in labor and potential profit, according to the suit.
As for Epic, the suit claims the company was perfectly able to make a workable version of Unreal Engine 3 for E3 2006 to show off its own Gears of War, but withheld the technology from its partners for its own advantage. When pressed for the updates and engine tweaks that allowed Gears of War to run well, Silicon Knights says it was told those updates were "game specific" enhancements not covered by the agreement, as opposed to an "engine level" update that would be covered.
Silicon Knights claims those partners were stuck with an Xbox 360 engine that was unable to handle multicore processing, subject to long load times, inefficient memory usage, and crippling slowdown. The developer further claims that Epic would ignore its requests to correct those problems unless doing so would also benefit the development of Gears of War. It also said Epic consistently advised licensees to code things like particle effects in one manner, while at the same time using a completely contradictory method in Gears of War.
The suit accuses Epic of a number of misdeeds, including fraud, negligent misrepresentation, intentional interference with contractual obligations, breach of warranty, and unjust enrichment. Silicon Knights is seeking to have the contract between itself and Epic Games declared null and void and be refunded all of the money it spent to license Unreal Engine 3. The developer also wants to be awarded punitive damages for the offenses it alleges Epic committed. Finally, the studio is asking that Epic be forced to surrender all profits garnered by Gears of War as a result of misconduct.
"That advantage was nowhere more evident than at E3 2006, where Gears of War was awarded 'Best Game in Show' and garnered nothing but laudatory press," the suit reads. "By contrast, Silicon Knights--one of the only other developers to publicly display a playable demonstration of its game--saw Too Human roundly criticized in the videogame press for its technical problems and generally unpolished appearance. The damage to Silicon Knights caused by Epic's misconduct was manifest, because E3 attendees were able to compare Too Human with another game running ostensibly the same game engine, Gears of War, with vastly superior results."
The suit says that the new engine, which it simply refers to as "The Silicon Knights Engine," is built on Unreal as per the original agreement, but improves considerably on the technology. Furthermore, after the release of Too Human, all Epic code in the engine will be removed.
[UPDATE] Silicon Knights president and founder Denis Dyack released a statement about the suit, saying, "Our strong preference is to focus on making games, not be in court. Unfortunately though, as explained in our lawsuit, we have had extensive problems with the Unreal Engine 3 that Epic has been unwilling or unable to rectify. For more than a year, we have been trying to reach an agreement with Epic to resolve these issues without resorting to litigation, but were unable to come to reasonable terms with Epic. ... No doubt Gears is a fun and phenomenally successful game, but as we alleged in our complaint against them, we strongly believe that from the perspective of someone waiting for a game engine that Epic promised it would deliver almost two years ago, it seems pretty clear that Gears was built on the backs of the Unreal Engine licensees. We certainly stand by our allegations in the lawsuit that instead of using our licensing fees to develop and support the Unreal Engine 3, Epic used that money to build Gears."
Sorry berita nih dah 2 ari kuar, smlm ingat nak post.
Anyway, kalau korang bace berita tu, a bit technical tp leh faham. Personally bg aku walaupun Silicon Kngiht (SK) byk kuar games cam Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain dan MGS utk Gamecube, tp aku rasa SK terlalu baru utk jump into next gen console. Terutama nak guna engine baru yg blom tentu stable, sbbkan previous engine works so terus confident current and new engine will also works.
The best part ialah, SK kata kalau ade bugs then bagitau kat Epic akan untungkan Epic jugak sbb leh improve engine dan guna untuk Gear of Wars. Ini contoh best kalau kita ada IP untuk sesuatu product. Kita leh buat sesuka hati. Wahaha. Lepas tu SK cakap Epic kata nk buat particle effect kene buat cam ni, tp dlm GoW dia buat cara lain. Nice. Ahaha. Game engine dibuat oleh pembuat game mustilah taknak org lain lebih hebat dr depa tul tak? Ahaha.
Kalau dah camtu apsat SK nk guna jugak UR3? Spatutnya depa dah tau bende2 camni musti jadik. Plus setiap game kene royalti lagik, makin kaya Epic games.

Best jugak kalau beli UR engine ialah Depa akan kasik source code dan support. Dgn source code tu kita boleh modified engine buat improvement utk sesuaikan dgn game kita. But by doing so, kita tak akan dapat support, cara bagus Epic taknak kene sue.
Kebanyakan developers okay ngan term tu sbb support tak berapa penting, yg penting ialah kita dpt full working engine dgn source code, support is an added value. Drpd nk buat engine dr awal akan makan masa lebih 2 tahun baik beli. So sbb tu kita byk dengar game ini pakai game engine based on unreal engine 2 atau UR3. Sbb developers ni tau ape diaorang buat. Bg SK on the other hand, aku pung taktau. T_T
Antara game2 guna Unreal Engine 3:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Brothers In Arms: Hell's Highway — (2007) Gearbox Software
BioShock - (2007) Irrational Games
BlackSite: Area 51 — (2007) Midway Austin
Mass Effect — (2007) BioWare
Medal of Honor: Airborne — (2007) Electronic Arts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Vegas — (2006) Ubisoft
*utk full list kat
siniToo Human utk XBOX360, mungkin response dari media tak berapa bagus plus asyik extend jer, mungkin depa nk blame somebody and end up blamming Epic. Since Unreal Engine cost dekat RM 1 juta, Unreal Engine 3 camne la pulak. License available utk dptkan tp pricing blom announced publicly.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

QUOTE
Unreal Engine 3 Licensing Terms
Unreal Engine 3 is available for license now, and is aimed at early-adopter game developers who are targeting next-generation consoles and DirectX9 PC's. Several Unreal Engine 3 based projects are already underway; however, pricing has not been publicly announced.
Tp mungkin jugak salah Epic, kuar Engine blom siap ke, kita taktau ape deal depa buat. Kalu ikut kata SK, Epic guna duit dpt dr engine tu utk buat Gear of Wars. Mungkin jugak, kita tak tau.

;
Quote paleng best ialah:
QUOTE
Silicon Knights president and founder Denis Dyack released a statement about the suit, saying, "Our strong preference is to focus on making games, not be in court.....
T_T tepat sungguh, tp kalau dah salah plan utk game dev dan financially, nih la jadiknya. T_T
Yang rugi ialah pihak2 yg berlawan dan gamers jugak. T_T
p/s: SK mungkin patut beli Havok engine jer, ok what.


list game guna havok:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Def Jam: Icon
The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion
The Godfather
F.E.A.R.
Dead Rising
*list penuh kat
sinihOther resources:
Gamespot NewsUnreal Engine 3 (Engine Detail)Lagi detail dari devmaster punya,
UnrealWiki